A stunning record of violence, disease, and more is recorded in the stumps of trees.
When we cut over-abundant trees to restore space for oak reproduction and to generally restore health to the woodland, a graphic history emerges.
Here, in Somme Prairie Grove Nature Preserve, the stump above was the first to catch my eye. A hickory in an oak woods needs to contend with burns. This one was severely scorched twice - and then largely recovered. In those thick black areas, the living phloem and cambium were dead. If you look carefully, you can see the very wide growth rings where the tree was racing to heal the wound.
Conservation note: if burns are mild (not very hot), large numbers of hickories may replace oak reproduction. Oaks win out only under the influence of hot burns.
In the case of this tree, the wound was so severe that it hasn't healed yet, after more then fifty years. If those widening rings had successfully met and healed the tree's circumference, it would have ended up as a hollow tree (perhaps to the pleasure of flying squirrels, raccoons, bats, and others who like to live in them).
In the case of this one, I've hyped up the contrast so we can see the rings better. After two thirds of the living outer wood was killed, it took 16 years, by my count, for the tree to heal all the way round. Where it did heal, a little black scar sticks up to mark the spot. The impacts of less severe burns now and then show up here and there.
This one shows a lot of purple - and many burns and many healings. The purple is herbicide - to prevent this stump from re-sprouting and healing again. Why, some people will ask, would anyone cut and herbicide trees in a Nature Preserve? Or burn the place, for that matter? For more on that, check out The Somme Experiment and Why Cut Trees?
The stump above is of a bur oak. We cut down dozens of trees - oaks (bur, white, red, and Hill's) and hickories (shagbark and bitternut). In this preserve, restoration management has gone on for just over 40 years. Decades ago we cut most of the the invasive buckthorn, box elder, black locust, and others. We didn't expect to still be cutting here, as the controlled burns would likely do all the thinning needed. But they didn't.
This "before" photo ...
... shows the problem. The old trees (wide trunks and horizontal limbs) typify the natural trees of an open oak woodland. The surrounding scores of thin, limbless young trees are a pathological result of no fire for many decades and, more recently, insufficiently hot fires. Bur oaks are much less likely to be damaged by fire as seriously as a hickory (or even most other oak species, to a lesser extent). Because of safety concerns in the metro area (or anywhere these days?) it's not possible to do prescribed burns on sufficiently hot, dry, and windy days to thin out the bur oaks. We could wait until most of them were killed off by the others, but that doesn't work for the rest of the ecosystem. The grasses, wildflowers, pollinators, ants, soil biota and myriad others that comprise the rare biodiversity of the oak woods would be increasingly lost, as some already has. Thus we cut.
This is a bur oak stump cut a few years ago, where bur oak pole trees were dense. Today I count at least 27 young, aspiring trunks rising out of it. This is what bur oaks do, after fire or saw. They're accustomed to setbacks. In the photo below of the same stump...... you can see a couple of those trunks now reaching six feet high. There are still too many trees (too much shade) for a fledgling bur oak to be altogether happy. But a more natural process is under way.
The oak above has had more adventures than I can figure out. But one story this stump tells is that early in its life it was damaged and put up two trunks. Both grew separately for a few years and then fused together. Then they burned again and recovered again. The tree before cutting looked kind of miserable. But if there weren't so many others competing with it, it may have triumphed.
This hickory also had two trunks for a while, and a lot of challenges, including more burns and rot.
May it rest in peace.
This stump has another message. It has suffered ...
... some fire damage over the years, but the next fire could well obliterate it. A dead tree has fallen against it that could burn with a lot more intensity than a leaf fire. In the case of ancient trees of the most precious species (to biodiversity conservation), we stewards try to clear away such hazards before the controlled burns.
This hickory stump was cut but not herbicided years ago. We thought that a more moderate approach. It's now rotting away, and out from it were growing two healthy new trunks. But bitternut hickory was probably not a substantial component of this bur oak woodland; there are way too many here. This time we'll herbicide them.
The photo above shows yet another approach. Here, where bur oaks were damagingly close together, we girdled some. Girdling will kill them. Woodpeckers will appreciate those standing dead trees, as will the many insects that eat such dead trees, as will the bluebirds, great crested flycatchers, and flying squirrels that will raise their young in the holes the woodpeckers abandon.
Once we thought we'd soon mostly just be "letting nature take its course." Now we find there's still more to it.
Acknowledgements
The stalwart Somme volunteers did the fine work that left these tell-tale stumps.
Thanks to Eriko Kojima for proofing and edits.
4 comments:
At Carl Hansen Woods (Poplar Creek Forest Preserve) I have noticed higher-quality plants paradoxically grow under the dense-smaller burr oaks rather than the large burr oaks. I wonder if this is because these areas had been more open and still possess higher-quality savanna vegetation. Even though people love the big-old oak trees, the vegetation under them in historic savanna is often poor.
When the big old oak trees finally die the locations subsequently becomes full of invasive species.
I made an interesting observation about the growth rings on these cut stumps. They are all close together when these trees were young and are now farther apart that they are older. This is the opposite of what often happens. I think what is visible in the growth rings of these tree is the difference before and after the buckthorn had been removed.
Like James, I too have found that areas of very old trees often have a more degraded understory than some nearby areas with young oaks. Some species dying in excess shade sometimes get the chance to reproduce in more open nearby areas. As James notes, brighter light levels allow both bur oaks and many associated rare grasses and wildflowers to find new homes, for a time. Sadly, if that area had been more prairie-like, the most bright-sun-associated species would be dying out in the new shade and competition. But good management (probably a lot of cutting and burning) can reverse the process, and the biodiversity can survive and re-sort itself in time.
I would not call the savanna/woodlands south of the prairie restoration at Carl Hanen Woods “prairie like.” Although, this type of habitat does occur in other areas of both the prairie restoration and the nature preserve. Only at the south of this area is there a slope steep enough to build, for the lack of a better words, ‘the momentum of fire’ to the point it pushes back the oaks and allows Sorghastrum nutans to grow.
On a south facing ridge there is Carex pensylvanica, a characteristic savanna species but the components of deeper woodlands are not present. The stream starting north of this area continuing to the west and then south forms a fire break that arrests fires driven by the primarily westerly winds. Therefore, fire would have had to reignite from spot fires and not be able to build to the intensity that historically led to prairie conditions just west of the stream. This area is on the continuum of savanna/open woodland with more savanna conditions on south facing slopes and along the stream but more open woodland conditions further into the interior.
The point of all the above is that not only "prairie-like" species are driven back by excess shade but also plants of what one of the people who comment on your blog so appropriate called our “fired timber.”
Post a Comment