Sunday, March 15, 2026

Three Historical Tidbits

About early restoration strategies, grade A prairies, and fire.

Linda Masters was looking through old files and found the documents that inspired Tidbit 1 and 3.

Tidbit 1

This drawing by Bobby Sutton (or actually, a xerox from his notebook) captures some features of the early work of what was then called the North Branch Prairie Project. First, we were authorized to girdle trees in degraded savannas whenever they were too thick for savanna seed to grow underneath. Second, when we broadcast seed, we always raked it into the soil (as we'd been told to do, but which in time - by experiment - we learned wasn't needed with fall planting). Third, the bag of bagels remind us that bagels were long our only workday snack, and the site steward brought them, on the way, that morning. 

Tidbit 2

The following three photos of the best Grade A section of Somme Prairie remind us of what we faced in our work to recover this "very high quality" prairie:

Most of it was degraded. Dense dogwood brush had blotted out large areas. Note above that fire had killed back the edge of this dogwood clump. Both fire and cutting were needed. 


The "two acres" of Grade A actually consisted of four small openings in the brush, divided from each other by the shade of dense trees and shrubs.

But the highest quality parts of the middle inspired us to work and invent as hard as we could. This beautiful rare nature deserved to survive.


Tidbit 3

Controlled burns were little understood by the outside world at that time. Getting approval to burn was not easy. But the system was developing. 






We needed to coordinate with the State, the County, and local fire departments. The burning permit from Cook County was especially quaint. Under "Method of Extinguishment" someone had typed "fire extinguisher." 

Although we had Forest-Preserve-wide approval for these burn, we were also asked to collaborate with the local staff. Before Cook County Superintendent of Conservation Roland Eisenbeis had started depending on us, the local Maintenance Superintendents had been the staff that took care of land outside of the Nature Centers. But mostly they mowed lawns and emptied garbage cans. They had no scientific staff. And even the Conservation Department had few staff experienced with burns. So once the Nature Preserves Commission hired me, the Forest Preserve staff decided to let me take on the work and responsibility for Nature Preserve burns. Not that there weren't bumps in the road. There were many.

This is the record of my conversation with the Superintendent of Maintenance of the Calumet region one beautiful morning.

 

Me: I just wanted to let you know we’d be burning Zanders Woods Nature Preserve this morning.”

 

Him: No, you can’t do that. It’s too windy.

 

Me: Oh, I’m sorry, I wasn’t asking you to authorize it. That’s all been taken care of though the Superintendent of Conservation. 

 

Him: Yeah, but you can’t burn today.

 

Me: Yes, I want to be clear that you don’t have to worry about trouble. I’m just notifying you. The crew is all here and finishing up the firebreaks. This is crucial, as you know, for the health of the Nature Preserve.

 

Him: It’s still no.

 

Me: Yes, I’ll be sure to tell the Superintendent that you have no responsibility for it. We’ll keep it very safe and make sure not to cause any extra work for you.

 

Him: Well, I guess we’ll just have to play it by the ears.

 

Do I come across as disrespectful or "difficult" in this? I certainly wouldn't talk with staff like that today. But back then, changes were needed, and when there had been conflict between Maintenance and Conservation, normally it was the powerful patronage haven of Maintenance that won out. I was being supported to facilitate change as best I could. 

And so, on this day, about two hundred acres of endangered-species-covered ground had its first burn in years (perhaps since the Potawatomi burned it?). What the Forest Preserve staff called Zanders Woods was called Thornton Lansing Road Nature Preserve by the Commission, and both agencies had responsibility for it. Bit by bit the Maintenance folks increasingly understood that the Conservation superintendent needed to be listened to about Nature Preserves. And as the burns proved safe, the prairie volunteers and the Maintenance supervisors actually got to like each other. Expert, hard-working, and dedicated volunteers deserve respect, and often get it.